Video: Trust vs Innovation – Finding the regulatory balance for a stronger Money Transfer sector

Continuing our recent discussions exploring some of the challenges and opportunities being faced by the remittance sector in these uncertain times, RemitONE hosted a webinar on the 24th of June 2021 regarding trust vs innovation in the money transfer sector and finding a strong regulatory balance. The panel was made up of experts from both RemitONE and our friends and partners in other global companies. In case you missed the webinar, here is a summary of the key insights.

Webinar moderator:

Aamer Abedi, CMO, RemitONE

Panellists:

• Ibrahim Muhammad, Payments Consultant, RemitONE
• Kathy Tomasofsky, Executive Director, MSBA
• Farook Al-Jibouri, Founder and Executive Director, Cyber Code Technologies

The financial services sector has always been one of the most heavily regulated industries but what are the key compliance regulations and challenges that we commonly see across all jurisdictions?

Kathy Tomasofsky: I would say that one of the most important things we see across all jurisdictions is rules concerning your customer (KYC). They may vary in different areas in terms of the level of detail, but all of the regulations ask for the companies to know their customers to prevent money laundering. The second area is risk management. As you enter into the business, understanding your customer profile, understanding the risks, and setting up the appropriate controls in order to effectively do business.

Ibrahim Muhammad: In terms of the ongoing situation; the pandemic had led to a lot of changes and this has pushed regulatory bodies into leaning more towards digital. However, in some markets, people might not have been able to adapt due to lack of infrastructure, so there have certainly been challenges. Broadly speaking, in terms of common regulations we can put it into two baskets: One is the AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and the other is the compacting of terrorist financing. In both these instances and in all jurisdictions, it always comes down to KYC, transaction monitoring and sanction screening.

Farook Al-Jibouri: Particularly when it comes to the Middle East, we do share the same difficulties globally but there are other unfortunate issues and circumstances unique to the region. What I see after the pandemic is a greater diversity when it comes to the Middle East and the level of maturity in the adoption of transformative financial services like Fintech. Some countries have been eager to jump on board but others are still living a hundred years in the past. Still, it’s a cash market where regulators have minimal impact when it comes to controlling the environment. This is what’s driving different regulators in the region to adopt more of a regional approach. The Middle East is ultimately a hot spot when it comes to AML and anti-terrorism. In fact, we are very much leading the way in those areas. The challenge, however, is in how you control different regions and balance them equivalently when there is such disparity in terms of digital adoption.

Is it fair to say that regulators are all for innovation in the Middle East? And is it also fair to say they are taking a lot of inspiration from UK and European regulators?

Farook Al-Jibouri: That’s a complicated question that I couldn’t really give one straight answer to. As I already said, the level of diversity in the Middle East is enormous. There is, however, global pressure from other regulators to bring all of the countries up to the same level and in some cases, those local regulators are simply not doing their jobs. Political complications are slowing the adoption of digital in some situations too. Again, it depends on the specific region. In Saudi Arabia, for example, it was announced recently that the first completely digital bank has been officially licensed by regulators.

Aamer Abedi: I know that when it comes to supporting Fintech start-ups, there is a lot of government support for these businesses in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Is it fair to say that regulators from the UAE and Saudi Arabia are helping to lead the way in terms of pushing innovation? Perhaps. I believe they are also taking a lot of inspiration from European and UK regulators.

Kathy Tomasofsky: While the Middle East may have different regions that are working at different levels, here in the United States we have forty-nine different entities within a federal regulation and it’s very difficult to navigate. It’s a complex structure and it varies from state to state. For example, the state of Wyoming is very friendly to blockchain and virtual currency but you’re not going to see that in every state.

How far are we from the ubiquitous federal money service license like you have in Europe in the US or the Middle East?

Kathy Tomasofsky: As far as the US is concerned, I’ll answer that question in two parts: The first part is that over the last two years, there have been some movements towards harmonising on a single license. There are currently twenty-nine states that have bonded together. So, if you’re a start-up company and you come into the states, you can have what’s called your level one documents; your financial statements and business plan. These will then be reviewed by a particular assigned state and the twenty-nine other states will say “Okay, we’ll accept these” and it’s as simple as that. Also, we’ve been working with other regulators on harmonising the money transmission law. We expect to have a draft of that sometime this summer, so perhaps beginning in 2023, 2024, we may see a more uniform law.

Farook Al-Jibouri: In the Middle East it can go in different directions. In some countries, opening a bank is extremely easy and in others, you simply can’t do it because the number of banks versus the market has already been defined by regulations. If there is any kind of new license or sub-license, it would be given to the established banks. In other countries though, we are starting to see the licensing of newer digital banks.

How are we doing in terms of open banking in the UK, US and the Middle East?

Ibrahim Muhammad: It’s interesting to see how the US market operates across states. Now, with the UK of course, we’re following the PSD2 standard, and from there we now have open banking. We are enjoying the benefits of PSD2 and though we don’t have passporting rights in the EU we can still redo the applications since they follow the same regulations. So that makes it easier for companies in the UK who would like to expand into EU markets.

Kathy Tomasofsky: In the US, I would honestly say we’re not there yet. There are indirect discussions coming through but we’re not in those open banking discussions like the UK has at this point.

Do you feel that the money transfer industry always plays second fiddle to the payments industry?

Kathy Tomasofsky: I think the introduction of digital and Fintech has made the government more supportive of the whole idea of global payments, whether it’s consumer to consumer or business to business. The fact that remittances fall under that umbrella gives us that support. In general, though, I think it’s more that the banking industry is less inclined to be supportive. It’s very challenging for a company to get a bank account here. There are some things that passed this past January with regard to the strengthening of AML programs and some items there that may help as far as de-risking is concerned, but that remains our pain point here. During the pandemic, these remittance businesses really were a lifeline for many US constituents, and I think that that helped to strengthen the profile of the companies as well.

Post-Brexit, has the government’s stance changes towards the MSB sector? Are they viewing us differently now?

Ibrahim Muhammad: Not exactly, in fact, the FCA has been quite open to supporting innovation in this space and that’s why they were opening up to a lot of Fintechs and new players establishing themselves in the UK. So for the UK specifically I’d say the government has actually been quite supportive.

The concerns that regulators cite can often be addressed by technology. What areas of technology are there in the industry that ensure we meet compliance?

Ibrahim Muhammad: They look into different areas when it comes to transparency; they look into the complaint handling process, incident reporting and the overall system checks and controls you have in place. Of course, AML is one component, so when they do company assessments, they cover all those areas. This assures them of how transparent that entity is towards its customers.

Farook Al-Jibouri: In the past six to nine months there has been a wide deployment of technological systems all across the Middle East but one of the problems is the lack of data. Certain countries probably have a full database but others do not and when you don’t have that database you have to rebuild it. As far as compliance tool deployment is concerned, in some countries, AML is being deployed and pushed by certain regulators but with a specific mandate rather than certain standards. Adopting these systems is definitely going to help in reducing the bureaucracy in the process. Because using certain technologies such as AI and blockchain we can see compliance happening on the fly through automation, rather than being checked manually or via a certain bureaucratic process.

In terms of technology, the US is the most powerful nation on Earth. But when it comes to our payments industry, the US arguably can’t compare with Europe. Why is this the case?

Kathy Tomasofsky: In the US, each state has its own perspective on what’s the best way to serve the consumer. Also, in defense of the regulators, there are so many new kinds of companies and technologies they have to keep learning how to regulate properly. If you look at Bitcoin, for example, some states are regulating virtual currency and have specific laws on their books while others are covering it under general money transmission and some haven’t even taken a pass at it yet. Ultimately, we have lots of interesting products that are being developed and the regulators need to understand what they are, how they work, where is the money going, who holds it, and how to protect the consumers. Then there’s the fact that, at a big-tech level, both sides of the administration are sceptical of companies like Facebook and Google and what they will bring to the US.

Aamer Abedi: It’s not just scepticism at a government level, it’s the big banks too. I know Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan Chase is very anti-Bitcoin. You can see these large investment banks being very anti-crypto, but I heard that some of these investment banks have already started preparing proposals for their own cryptocurrencies.

Facebook applied for a money transfer license in Spain a few years ago so you can now use WhatsApp to send money. You have companies like Apple and Google that have money transfer licenses and they’re operating under some sort of regulation. So, should our industry be worried?

Ibrahim Muhammad: The tech giants are definitely jumping into the remittance space and from what I see in the UK and the EU they will have a fight on their hands with the established players. Now, it depends on the approach the big techs take. They might acquire one of the large players and then enter into a partnership or it could be that they establish their own remittance identity since they have a huge customer base to draw from.

Kathy Tomasofsky: In the US I do think that, to some degree, we will see some of the smaller MTOs either disappear or merge with others due to the cost of compliance and licensing. But we’ve also seen in our market research that the selection by a consumer for a particular MTO is often done out of loyalty and is not just price based. I think we’ll see that with age, the younger consumer who’s grown up with technology will be that consumer who is more inclined to go to an Apple or Google Pay transmitter because they will feel a certain loyalty. Even here in the US, in traditional banking, we’re seeing that generation not having traditional bank accounts.

Farook Al-Jibouri: When it comes to the payments industry, what’s happening with the gigantic tech firms is very noticeable and not only in the US. If you look towards China, for example, WeChat predominantly controls the exchange of money over an instant message application and I do think that Facebook took the approach they did because of the success of WeChat. In the Middle East, we don’t have tech firms, but we do have telecom operators who know the technology, and those operators are actually very forward-thinking in terms of bringing those digital wallets and instant money transfers to their customers, particularly in parts of the region where they can get around regulations.

What do you think are the top compliance priorities in the post-pandemic age for any MSB?

Kathy Tomasofsky: In the post-pandemic age, we have seen such an increase here in the US in the remote work area. So security is a big compliance priority for us. We’ve seen specific states here in the US; New York and California, for example; where companies are required as part of their AML program to define what their security requirements are. We’ve seen an abundance of new phishing scams and email fraud here too, so that whole concept is important.

Ibrahim Muhammad: The top priority would be to keep things running steadily despite all the disruption. Because the pandemic has really given rise to something unprecedented. We all know has it has accelerated digital adoption. So, from a compliance perspective, I would say we need to keep pace and adapt to the latest technologies while ensuring that we cater to the needs of the people.

How do we build trust in the industry now, given where we are?

Farook Al-Jibouri: One of the things the ecosystem needs to be ready to build consistently in a post-pandemic world is communication. We all realise now that physical communication is not really there anymore. For example, here in the UAE, we’ve been working with financial companies located a few blocks from here that we’ve never met face-to-face. So, modern communication will be key in re-establishing that flow of data between the technology provider from one side and the receiver from the other side. Also, post-pandemic, you have to be agile with whatever challenges the financial system throws at your feet.

Ibrahim Muhammad: Trust and innovation shouldn’t be competing; they have to go hand-in-hand. Regulatory bodies need to understand what innovation actually brings to the table and how they can ensure that this innovation does not cause any sort of issues with the consumers or stakeholders. It has to be a balanced approach and they have to work in a very collaborative manner. Regulatory bodies need to be more aware of what’s happening in the innovation space, and they should really understand the needs and then set up the regulations accordingly.

Kathy Tomasofsky: I think you have to build trust and communication but I would also add education into the mix, and that goes back to my earlier point – the regulators have so much coming at them that they need someone to help facilitate it all. At MSBA, we represent the services of eighty different companies; from companies that sell prepaid cards to small MTOs. Being able to present such a diverse group to regulators helps to accelerate that communication and education, and helps to build trust.

Our thanks to Kathy, Ibrahim, and Farook for their words and their time.

RemitONE’s award-winning compliance platform is used and trusted by leading banks and money transfer operators (MTOs) all over the world. Our Compliance Rules Engine™ is one of the world’s first business rules-driven compliance platforms. You can simply input the rules set by your regulatory authority and the engine uses its sophisticated algorithm to enforce them.

What next?

Now that you’ve read our article we want to help you get the most out of it and deep dive into the trends and predictions shared.

Tap into our experts and schedule a free 30min consultation.

Video: Perspectives on Digital ID – What the future may look like (eKYC and AML)

Continuing our recent discussions exploring some of the challenges and opportunities being faced by the remittance sector in these uncertain times, RemitONE hosted a webinar on the 24th of June 2021 regarding the ever-shifting perspectives on digital ID in the remittance sector, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic. The panel was made up of experts from both RemitONE and our friends and partners in other global companies. In case you missed the webinar, here is a summary of the key insights.

Webinar moderator:

Saiful Alom, Head of R&D at RemitONE

Panellists:

• Richard Spink, Sales Director of Channel and Partnerships, GBG
• Osama Al Rahma, Head of Business Development, Emirates Bank
• Reynell Badoe, Payments Manager, Stanbic Bank

Why is digital ID important?

Osama Al Rahma: Digital ID is of course incredibly important through its use of KYC (know your customer) and the ability to identify the customer. In fact, it’s largely through the use of digital ID that we have been able to protect the financial regime from crime on a wide scale. The shift towards digital already started pre-pandemic and has only increased in recent months. No longer are banks encouraging the use of traditional brick and mortar branches. Instead, they are relying heavily on their digital offerings, which by default means that the ability to identify the genuine user of such services is more effective. We’re also seeing a shift to digital with eKYC (electronic know your customer) on a much larger scale when it comes to remittances. This will allow us access to machine learning with Artificial Intelligence, which is incredibly powerful when integrated with real-time streaming. Using this technology, we’ll be able to conduct more diligent processes within transaction screening and monitor the behaviour of certain users in greater depth. For the sake of financial security on the compliance side, this is incredibly important.

Richard Spink: At the end of the day, digital ID reduces compliance costs so it’s always going to be important from a purely financial perspective. However, there is no widely regarded standard for digital ID so far, at least as far as MTOs are concerned. What MTOs have generally been using as the core tenants of their ID is proof of identity and proof of address, which are attributes that can be used by financial services around the world. Of course, a standard would be ideal, but as there are so many different regulations in different countries, this is unlikely to happen anytime soon. As an aside, it’s worth noting that while Revolut has a lot of customers, they’re not profiting very well and the reason they’re not making enough money is supposedly due to the cost of compliance. Digital ID will help businesses globally and save money on the process of knowing who their customers are and the cost of compliance as a result. And I think the technology to do this already exists.

Saiful Alom: It would be ideal if there was a way to digitally identify a person, ensuring that they have met all KYC and AML needs. However, due to the world we live in, there are a lot of complications to work around.

What is the adoption of digital ID like in your respective markets and has COVID accelerated your options?

Reynell Badoe: From a Ghanaian perspective, if you look at the stats, the number of people with access to the internet is proportional to the number of people with access to so-called big data. Having access to the internet means giving up your information and as a result, you also have access to financial services and remittances. It’s a worthwhile trade-off for most. However, there are 1.2 billion people in Africa, and only a handful have access to the internet. While COVID certainly things and meant there had to be a quick adoption of digital money transfer channels from traditional methods, we still have a lot of catching up to do digitally. With regards to how? The pandemic has meant more people have had to use data platforms and open mobile wallets, creating a digital shift of necessity, so the groundwork has already been laid.

Have there been any challenges in terms of Trust Private Security?

Osama Al Rahma: Trust, privacy and security are the three main pillars when it comes to finance and that will never change. The challenge is that by the time that technology evolves, different unforeseen issues tend to arise. For example, using AI for facial recognition might be incredibly convenient when it comes to opening your phone with a glance but the negative consequence is that it is another means for fraud to occur. When we speak up about this, we need validity.

Saiful Alom: In terms of Trust Privacy Security, this is a concern for all of us as consumers – particularly seeing as online services have been adopted at such a large consumer scale since lockdown began. Trust has increased in these online services and so consumers use them more regularly. However, there are many issues to consider and chief among them is privacy. Because your data is a lot more venerable now and consumers transferring money online may question how secure their transactions really are, and if it can be hacked or breached.

Is digital ID a potential solution or a problem to identity fraud?

Richard Spink: If you’re lending money, then I think that there is certainly high risk. It’s a different process to opening up a bank account or sending money on behalf of someone else. The key thing is to ensure you are actually sending that money to the correct person and thankfully, there are more reliable tools that are able to detect these issues now. It comes down to the organisation’s fraud screening processes. The question is how much information are you able to acquire and what does that fraud screening process look like? The standard answer is that there is no silver bullet – there isn’t one organisation that has everything available to run the process at zero risk. However, in the same way, there is always risk in a face-to-face transaction too. As we all know. “Good friction” is necessary for both scenarios. What has changed in the digital process is that it is now acceptable to present an identity, run that process with a mobile phone and check for duplicates. In the future, things will get even more secure with the use of biometric technology and face recognition, thumbprint recognition and the ability to check a chip on a passport. This last process is something we’ve started working with recently. In all, there is a lot more information that is available when trying to detect fraud these days, however, the same rule still applies: you need to decide what information you want to capture and make a decision on it.

The government has been known to over-regulate and stifle innovation. Do you think that we have the right balance when it comes to trust vs innovation?

Reynell Badoe: I think that the government has a lot of responsibility to provide the basic and necessary requirements and nothing more. On the issue of trust, we’ve seen leakages in the past – breaches of customer information from companies. So, on a consumer level, there is the issue of trust to contend with, as people are sceptical as to whether or not their information is safe. An example of this is free apps – technically they’re not “free” in the sense that you give up some aspects of your digital ID data in exchange for access to that app. I’d say the question is: can the information be used against me in the future? In terms of innovation, there’s a need for better services – we need a safer place to operate without having to worry about any of these concerns and challenges. There needs to be a fine balance between regulation and opening up certain aspects of digital ID.

Where does the government sit within this space in terms of digital ID?

Osama Al Rahma: When it comes to the government, it comes down to the level of leadership of that nation and their perspective on digital transformation. They then need to lay down the military frameworks, the standards and the security aspects in order to develop a secure environment. It’s been said that once you introduce digital financial services then it’s not a case of if you will encounter fraudsters but when. There is a lot of truth to this adage, as I have seen myself when we launched a remittance app and immediately fraud occurring on a massive scale. The reality is that if you are not well-enough equipped in different aspects, you will likely encounter problems. One of those aspects is having clear risk mitigation policies, and the second is to use advanced technology to identify such risks. A third aspect, meanwhile, is knowledge and awareness. Most issues I’ve seen actually involve the consumer allowing the phishing to happen due to his lack of knowledge on how scams can occur. It’s all about protecting your consumers.

What advice would you give to MTOs and banks who are thinking of adopting digital ID within their processes?

Richard Spink: My advice would be to keep things simple and understand the regulation before you talk to a business like us. Everyone will give you different advice on regulation. In my world, I need to understand the regulation of the market the jurisdiction is operating in. For example, if your business is registered in Germany, the German financial regulation is very specific on how want that ID verification process to run. In fact, they want it done via video. But this isn’t the case for the whole of the EU. So, although the EU is one trading block, in theory, in practice there are different processes required depending on where your business is regulated. I’d also recommend considering what you need to do to confirm that someone is who they say they are. In my experience, finding proof of address is the hardest process and yet it’s required by most regulators. My experience in the last ten years shows that the proof of address data is large in quantity however there is still nowhere near enough to satisfy the global coverage.

What are the critical questions you will ask an ID verification provider?

Osama Al Rahma: Before asking the questions, develop your own strategy and consider what you will want in the near future, including your offerings, products and other engagements with the consumers as this will dictate the type of provider you want to consider. On one hand, look at the flexibility of upscaling the technology, as you want someone to partner with as opposed to a short-term solution that will leave you stuck with a legacy system that will hinder your ability to enhance your offerings in the future. On the other, look at the ability of the service provider – have they got a system that is dynamic enough to cope with the constantly shifting regulatory requirements?

What do you think this space will look like in two to five years?

Reynell Badoe: At this point, it’s all speculation, especially with the speed at which technology is advancing. For example, things that one would have expected to happen in a decade could happen as soon as next year. At this point, there’s already a lot of personal information online both knowingly or unknowingly. Now, people are less concerned about giving away their data and are more concerned about where it’s going. For example, if there’s a new online financial institution that people are gravitating towards then I, as a customer, would want to find out a bit more before parting with my information. This has led to the use of federated IDs where I can sign in to a website using my existing Google account because I would naturally be more comfortable leaving my limited information with Google as opposed to this relatively unknown third party. I personally expect to see a lot more use of federated IDs in the future.

How do you see the rate of digital adoption in sending and receiving markets, in terms of duration, post-pandemic and pre-pandemic?

Osama Al Rahma: During the pandemic, I think the main shift was that consumers released how digital engagement was beneficial to them. Why do you think China was able to so effectively control COVID-19? It’s because of their AI and biometrics. They were able to use this to track and trace the people who had been in touch with an infected person and find out which areas they were prominent in. The only positive, economic growth in 2020, in comparison to other developed countries, was China and one of the primary reasons was this biometric ability. This is already being applied elsewhere today – going through an airport completely contactless, for example. With regards to the future, the adoption of these new methods should be reviewed seriously by all financial companies. It might be a slow burn but always look at how they will impact your business model and how you will be able to use them to your advantage in the future.

What next?

Now that you’ve read our article we want to help you get the most out of it and deep dive into the trends and predictions shared.

Tap into our experts and schedule a free consultation.

Video: Remittances in the Pandemic Age – Obstacles and Opportunities

Continuing our recent spate of discussions exploring some of the challenges being faced by the remittance sector in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, RemitONE hosted a webinar on the 23rd June 2021 regarding the obstacles and opportunities of remittances in the pandemic age. The panel was made up of experts from both RemitONE and our friends and partners in other global companies. In case you missed the webinar, here is a summary of the key insights.

Webinar moderator:

• Aamer Abedi, CMO, RemitONE

Panellists:

• Leon Isaacs, CEO, DMA Global
• Naved Ashraf, Head of India & South Asia, MoneyGram International
• Julie Neogy, Managing Director: Global Payments, MFS Africa

Originally the World Bank predicted that global remittances were set to decline by 20% as a direct result of the pandemic. Was last year as bad as expected across the Middle East and Africa?

Leon Isaacs: The numbers probably indicate that it wasn’t as bad as had been forecast. If we think back to this time last year, things were generally looking pretty grim for the second quarter. But actually, during the rest of the year, things really recovered in most countries. There might have been a projection of a 20% fall for last year but the actual fall ended up being only about 1.6% on a global basis – much smaller than even the most optimistic projections that were happening this time last year. I think all the individual stories behind both businesses and senders and receivers of remittances will probably show you the challenges but there’s also a great level of optimism and resilience that seems to have carried into this year.

What have been the main challenges during this period and in your point of view, are we at where you think we should be in terms of recovery?

Julie Neogy: We’re a digital payments company so we’ve actually been positively affected by COVID. In fact, our transaction values during that period doubled! I don’t really have an answer for recovery because it’s been so successful for us, but our partners certainly faced some challenges. Some of the remittance companies that we work with weren’t equipped for digital payments, for example, so they really had some hard times adjusting. I think it’s also worth mentioning the regulators were traditionally a little resistant when it came to cross border payments, but they really adjusted quickly during this time by doing things like waving transaction fees, allowing for larger limits and even encouraging interoperability in the central African region. There were challenges but I felt like besides ourselves we had a lot of our partners really thrive in that time period.

Naved Ashraf: Honestly, during April and May last year it was like doomsday and we saw an abrupt business decline because of job losses, people holding back on remittances, sending lesser amounts back home, retail locations being shut and curfews across the globe. It also led to reversed migration with people moving back home and not really knowing how long they were going to be staying for and how long the COVID situation would last. However, recovery was faster than expected. Obviously, there was governmental support, so all of this also led to people sending money back home to their loved ones or friends that needed it. And, as Julie mentioned, digital was a huge help. Moneygram is a hybrid company, and people really woke up to digital during the pandemic and started sending more money, even in countries like India, which is the largest remittance market in the world. In fact, we’ve seen triple-digit growth in the last few months.

Do you have any comments on channel cannibalisation? And do you think there is enough data out there in the market that our audience can access?

Leon Isaacs: I think the short answer is no. Obviously, the shift to digital has become very pronounced thanks to COVID but with money transfer platforms, the definition of digital often means digital only needs to be at one end of the transaction. So we should take any numbers with a pinch of salt. Also, more than half of transactions still involve cash as the key part of the transaction. Cash is still a key part of transactions even if one end is digital. I think the shift towards digital has really started, which is good. But from a data perspective, I think we’re going to need surveys that are conducted by governments or international bodies.

Some businesses have thrived during the COVID period, what do you think their differentiators have been to insulate them?

Julie Neogy: I would say it’s their agility. Agile companies have thrived. As soon as COVID hit our partnership with Moneygram skyrocketed because they were really open to changing the way that they thought and worked. For the people in the informal market that had a traditional resistance to digital payments, that barrier is now gone as digital became more of a necessity for them. I also think the companies that benefited most were the ones already in the digital space and were already on the right side of regulations, so had less groundwork to do.

What notable shifts have you seen in the remittance sector? What do you think will stick in the long term and where do you see the industry headed?

Leon Isaacs: Digital is definitely here to stay; it’s the new normal. I  think that means digital as a channel rather than just remittances. So it doesn’t just have to be remittances that are being pushed, it could be lots of other financial services. In most cases, I think it has demonstrated to people that there are alternatives that they can access that are actually quite easy to use and have many advantages that they presumed they couldn’t get before. So for instance you can now transfer money to much more remote places and the speed and the certainty is all there. But I think some of that will undoubtedly shift back after the pandemic. Historically, remittances have generally been viewed as a transactional business but I think that’s changing. One of the things we’ve really seen is that digitisation gives consumers a better understanding of the product and gives us a better understanding of the consumer. And finally, perhaps for all of us, COVID really brought the attention of policymakers and governments back to remittances. Because of this increased attention, companies are also more likely to keep their customers or attract new customers because of the improvements being suggested by the regulators. For me, that might be one of the best long term benefits.

What do you think these bigger players are doing, the established players in our industry, what steps are they taking to tap into the informal sector?

Naved Ashraf: In the south Asian market the informal sector used to be a big market  but I wouldn’t say it’s the same now. The rise of organised remittances has really taken over, and I think the biggest players are into all the nooks and corners of the countries now. The people who used to rely on somebody delivering money to them has almost completely stopped.

Julie Neogy: It’s hard to say when I’m wearing my MFS Africa hat because we are only working with regulated entities. But what I can say is that when we’re talking about mobile money usage, we look at the number of users we are sending to on both the sending side and the receiving side. And the actual amount of people we are sending to on the receiving side has increased in all of the countries that we do business in.

Aamer Abedi: For me, it’s all about interoperability. In a receiving market like India or Zimbabwe, for example, the ability for money transfer solutions and mobile network operators to work together should help bring the untapped sector into the formal fold. Because the informal sector hardly uses mobile phones. But when they realise that cash can be transferred into a mobile digital wallet in some way, and this digital wallet can be used to send money to other mobile phone users, then you are strengthening our sector and bringing new customers into the formal fold.

Leon Isaacs: Interoperability definitely has become more important as it allows non-bank financial institutions to participate in mainstream financial services. So, for instance, we’ve seen a major increase in remittance software companies being able to credit bank accounts. If you can put together what systems exist now, then you can move money across different types of services where it needs to go and allow customers to access different types of products more quickly without building something yourself from scratch.

Is the usage of digital payment vs cash/physical methods, sustainable post Covid?

Julie Neogy: I want to say yes, but in Africa, the main barrier for using digital payments has always been trust. But there are a lot of other barriers, especially in certain African countries where cash-out fees are really high and wallet sizes are really small. Countries like Kenya and Uganda made adjustments during COVID. Now if they revert to the old ways and the cash-out fees go up or if send fees are reimplemented then it’s hard to say how sustainable it is. It really depends on how the regulators in the receiving countries are responding.

Has the bank account situation improved with the drive to go digital? Or are we in the same situation, as we’ve always been?

Leon Isaacs: We thought that more digitisation would help but from what I hear, it is not making a sufficient difference. There are still lots of companies that are having real difficulties getting accounts, particularly the newer technology companies. This is not just a UK or Europe issue either, it’s happening in most parts of the world. In a way, the discussion around it has moved from a business model where there were lots of concerns around the risks associated with digital into a discussion around cryptocurrency. I think what is concerning for me is that from a government level, things were really bad in 2012 and 2013 with many companies losing their accounts. Then things hit a plateau, and because they weren’t getting any worse, attention came off. But of course, things weren’t getting any better either. For me, the problem is not really solved and it’s only going to get solved if governments are prepared to take action, and I think governments are reluctant to take action particularly. It’s actually where digitisation should help because there’s much greater transparency and control, and the ability to identify people.

Naved Ashraf:  From a South Asian perspective it is still harder for smaller players to get remittance bank accounts than it is for bigger players, but it is possible for smaller players to enter the mainstream. You just have to work a little harder than the rest.

If we have the technology, and we are proving that the technology is there, then why aren’t the governments and regulators doing more to put pressure on banks to help sustain the industry?

Leon Issacs: Ultimately, most banks want or need to deal in US dollars and to do that they need relations with big NY banks and these are the banks setting the standard. Because everybody wants to deal in US dollars at the moment, all countries are affected. This is not just an issue for money transfer platforms, but banks too, and the problem will not be resolved any time soon. There was talk about maybe remittance companies only dealing in euros rather than dollars to avoid that, but you can’t do that on a global basis.

What next then, in terms of opportunities that lie ahead for both traditional and digital MSBs post-pandemic?

Naved Ashraf: We touched upon bitcoin but bitcoins are not legal tenders yet, it’s quite popular but not legal. The central bank digital currencies are obviously blockchain-based and that is used to combat the growth of too many cryptocurrencies. But no bank as far as I know has banned the central bank digital currency. In terms of opportunities for both traditional and digital MSBs, I think blockchain that combats cryptocurrency growth could be the way forward but the biggest hurdle for blockchain adoption would be standardisation. There’s SWIFT which is like a standard that other agencies are also getting set up, and once that comes in I think it will bring in a lot of standardisation across the board. Also, we have to deal with the multiple layers of banks right now, and the lack of transparency at the moment of money. And obviously, we can’t forget about the customers, whatever apps and websites we are using right now they have to be more customer-friendly.

What does the future for the remittance business look like as we are witnessing more and more third-party open banking apps being launched?

Julie Neogy: Competition is fierce and I think what’s going to be exciting is that companies need to offer more than just a money transfer system. As more third-party apps are launched, remittance companies need to innovate with the customer’s best interests in mind in order to stay on top. Companies really need to stay at the cutting edge and come up with actual products instead of just conceptualising them.

Naved Ashraf: What I see is that there are two mediums of transfer. One is digital and one is traditional. I would say the end goal is the customer because everything has been done to make it faster, cheaper, easier and more convenient for the customer to receive their money. What will happen I think  is that both mediums will have to learn to co-exist. Cash is here to stay.

Leon Isaacs: I agree that cash isn’t going away any time soon because very few specific markets in the region can operate using only digital payments right now. Ultimately, the majority of our users live in markets where cash usage is still quite high. I guess the question is, can you make a big enough business out of digital at the current time? It is very difficult to do digital-only. You have to find the right markets  with the right remittance software and you need to have as many options as you can make work for you economically for consumers. Because at the end of the day, the consumer is going to use the service that works for them.

For more information or to request a free consultation with one of our money transfer specialists, please email marketing@remitone.com

Video: Better Together – Building a New Global Standard for the Remittance Ecosystem

Continuing our recent discussions exploring the challenges being faced by the remittance sector in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, RemitONE hosted a webinar on the 23rd of June 2021. The 90-minute conversation centred around the concept that in order to “build back better” after the pandemic, the money transfer sector needs to work together to create a new global standard. The panel was made up of experts from both RemitONE and our friends and partners in other global companies. In case you missed the webinar, here is a summary of the key insights.

Webinar moderator:

• Oussama Kseibati, RemitONE

Panellists:

• Hugo Cuevas-Mohr, CEO at Mohr World Consulting
• Sidharth Gautam, Head of Sales at AZA Finance

How significant is the remittance industry and who are the traditional and new players in the remittance ecosystem?”

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: I’ll begin by defining what remittances actually are. The term remittance implies a family member sending money to other family members, for example. Remittances for the world bank, meanwhile, are only considered “worker remittances”, so the money transferred between family members is around 650 to 700 billion dollars per year of recorded remittances. On the world trading stage, of course, this number would not be extremely significant, but it is important to understand that this is higher than the investment from one country to another. It is also much higher than the aid that developing countries receive, so the significance is relative to different countries. In terms of significance, it varies depending on the development of the country. By comparing the remittance figure to GDP you can see that some countries are at 30% to 35% of their GDP, which is the case in Nepal and Haiti, for example. Interestingly, by contrast, big countries such as China and India will undoubtedly have high volume, however, there is less significance as the GDP is low. Another comparison is the population: if you divide remittances by the population of the country, then you can determine the significance of the remittance ecosystem based on each average individual in that country. Using this logic, Lebanon is number 1 in terms of significance, as it is a small country with a small population and a huge amount of money every year. This same principle can be applied to towns as well.

Sidharth Gautam: I completely agree with Hugo. In fact, in a few south sub-Saharan countries, remittance is essentially their backbone. There is a word developed by the World Bank called LMIC: “Low and Medium Income Countries.” Remittance is incredibly important for LMICs. Their entire country arguably depends on them.

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: Adding to that point, remember that money goes to the lower fourth or the lower fifth of the economy. Remittances are also an important backbone for poor families in LMICs, therefore they are a really important “backbone” for them. Regardless of how those poor families spend the money, it doesn’t change the fact that they depend on remittances to survive. Indeed, sometimes 60 to 70% of a poor family’s income is primarily derived from remittances.

Who are the traditional and new players within that ecosystem, focusing on the traditional versus new and formal versus informal?

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: It depends on a few things. In remittances, there’s always a sending market and a paying market. With regards to the pandemic, there was a small decrease in certain countries, particularly if they depended on Europe. However, if they depended on the United States you actually saw an increase, which was completely unexpected. The traditional sending players have always been agent-based, so brick and mortar operations were affected negatively in the early part of the pandemic as people couldn’t visit those agencies. As a result, every new digital player saw an increase. The more digital the payment; the higher the remittances would be, for example in Africa, mobile money companies saw an increase in sales during the pandemic due to the fact that remittances landed in mobile wallets. So we have seen transformation, however, I think it is too early to tell what will change and what will stay the same as traditional companies are evolving.

Oussama Kseibati: In the past, in traditional Asian markets cash has always been king. But over the past 10 years we have seen innovation being brought into the market and a move towards digital that has been hastened by the pandemic. I think as we get to the second and third generations that are more innately familiar with new technology, things are only going to get better.

How do you think we can enhance payments through successful partnerships and working together?

Sidharth Gautam: Partnerships are absolutely critical. No one organisation can facilitate change by itself; it has to be a concerted effort. We all have our core competencies, so the best practice should be to focus on these competencies and then align with partners who have a laser sharp focus in another  particular area. AZA Finance is a firm believer in that, and our partnership with RemitONE is proof. It’s a natural combination of one plus one rather than automatic progression. That way you can start to create an ecosystem of consumers, brick and mortar agents, digital companies, aggregators (AZA) and technology, providers like RemitONE. All of these players have come together to give a seamless, end-to-end experience to the consumer. There is no point in reinventing the wheel but we have to drive meaningful and coordinated change at a global level over a sustained period of time to make it happen.

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: Sidharth is right on the money. It maybe even as recently as a year and a half ago, partnerships in this space weren’t really stories but it’s booming now. You have to understand that traditional companies did everything on their own and always built their own systems, distribution, networks and compliance. But that’s the old way of doing things and for some companies, it can be difficult to break the habit. There are so many legacy remittance systems right now, and sometimes it might be best to just scrub the old system entirely, salt the earth and start with something fresh. Realise what you’re good at – the thing that makes you different, and work with partners to fill in the gaps. Also, remittance is one financial service and there are many other financial services the same customers need, so you have to integrate those services. Unless you want to do all of that yourself, which becomes rather complicated, it’s always better to partner with a company that has the right knowledge and resources. The new breed of digital banks are all being built on that more modular way of thinking.

How does one foster a good working partnership?

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: In our industry, the important partnerships that we have is with the banking sector and sometimes we forget that. It’s been hard in some markets to build good banking relationships and now you’ve also got cryptocurrency and the new wave of digital banks to deal with too. You need to create that banking partnership to provide that flow of funds in the collecting and disbursement sites and if you are cross-border you’re also dealing with foreign exchange, so you need to be able to be very good at managing currencies. How that partnership is able to exist and survive is all about transparency; sitting down and being honest with each other – what you need, what you’re willing to provide and how that partnership is going to be organised.

Sidharth Gautam: We are the biggest non-bank currency provider in Africa and apart from Southeast Asia, Africa is one of the biggest remittance receiving markets in the world. So we get a lot of requests from small and medium-sized MTOs that want to expand into Africa but lack the knowledge and the data to do so. They don’t have those resources like the big larger MTOs where they can hire a market research team and that is where the partnership comes into play. So, not only do we give them an aggregator and last-mile liquidity but we also help them with Google Analytics, for example. I feel like marketing is where you explore the unexplored and it takes a partnership to the next level. That’s where long-term relationships get forged.

How can you sort a good partnership from a bad one?

Sidharth Gautam: It is very clear to me what my core competencies are and where I can leverage somebody else’s competency. It’s both a mix and a marriage between two equals and it has to be built on a common remittance platform for everybody. There are always going to be challenges. We are a regulated industry so you can’t just partner with anybody. You need to be very clear as to whether or not your partner is certified and that is the basis of any partnership in our business. Remittance is a very fragmented industry – the top three players have major market shares and yet every day you see new players coming up, primarily in the digital space where you can launch in the space of a few months. So there are lots of little guys scrambling for attention that might not be on the same page as you from a regulatory perspective. So do your research. What you also need to see is how potentially scalable that partnership is. For a successful partnership, it is important to understand not only your core competencies but what you want to achieve by having that partner on board and where you want to end up.

Oussama Kseibati: I agree. In fact, I’ve known companies in the past that have chosen certain providers they want to grow their business with but because they’ve used a certain tech provider it’s very hard for them to now uproot their whole business and take clients over to a system that they can scale. Again they’ve gone with someone who’s slightly smaller or built their own system and it causes more headaches further on down the line.

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: Partnerships sometimes don’t work. And that’s fine. Sometimes I speak with companies and I have to be quite philosophical about it and say that sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn’t and you can’t really put a finger on why. Also, companies change and you have to be flexible to see where the market, takes you. Maybe you need to get rid of a partnership because you’re going in a different direction? So flexibility is something that you must have in this market. The pandemic has arguably made it even harder for everyone to plan for the long term, so you need flexibility about how you set up your structure. Flexibility is part of the game in everything we do these days. Even as people we need to be flexible enough to adjust to new ideas and new possibilities.

What are the developing trends in our ecosystem and what is RaaS?

Hugo Cuevas-Mohr: Remittance as a Service (RaaS) is so interesting because it has been such a long time coming. It is essentially an all-in-one solution that allows companies to launch money transfer software services from any particular geographic location. How does it work? Let’s say you have a good brand in Southeast Asia or in Africa and you want to do business in the UK. Maybe you can put your own brand in a product like an app or a mobile wallet and it is your image but using a third-party service. That’s the deal –  I give you my brand and we do a partnership together, all those remittances come to me but to my client in the UK or in Europe, it’s the brand they’re interacting with. You’re behind the scenes. It’s really going to change the market. What all regulators want is better service and lower cost; a more compliant remittance system and this could definitely give them that.

How can remittance fix the gig economy, and how should we participate?

Sidharth Gautam: That is my favourite question so far! We are all are so used to hearing this word, “gig economy,” but what actually is it? Let’s talk stats. As of 2020, 1 in 10 people in the UK is employed by this “gig economy,” the equivalent figure in the US is around 8%. By 2024, one in four people, which is 40% of the workforce, will be in the gig economy and how can remittance solve the problem? Let me give you a real use case: An Uber driver in the UK gets paid directly into their bank account, which is fine, of course. Now, let’s shift this problem to Africa, or Tonga or some other nondescript, sub-Saharan country where almost one-third of the population doesn’t have a bank account. How do these Uber drivers get paid? That is where this whole idea of mobile money and digital wallets comes into play. That’s what the gig economy is doing and up until now either these people are getting left out or the  bank charges are not transparent and it takes ages for these guys to get paid. In the US and the UK, you do a transfer today from the UK and it’s in the US account the next day. But for Africa, it can take a week. I mean, it depends on the intermediary bank that might have its own checks charges but also, in certain parts of Africa there is one soft currency for seven countries and the banks of those seven countries don’t talk with each other. That is where organisations like ours play such an important role in the gig economy, helping these people get the money, faster and quicker because that’s the way forward.

For more information or to request a free consultation with one of our money transfer specialists, please email marketing@remitone.com

RemitONE partners with Evantagesoft to launch innovative remittance services to Pakistanis at home and abroad

RemitONE, the leading end-to-end money transfer solutions provider, announces its partnership with Evantagesoft Private Limited, Pakistan’s principal financial technology solution provider.

This partnership launches innovative remittance services in the region and establishes a remittance aggregator using the collaboration of both teams.

“We are pleased to offer an innovative end-to-end remittance service in the country using the RemitONE platform. As remittances are on a rise in the country, there is a need to streamline all the complexities that have been faced by the stakeholders involved in the process. We foresee a vital role that RemitONE will play in making this happen through its highly successful and compliant money transfer platform. It will enable the ability to send money, airtime, banks transfer, and mobile transfers from a network of more than 100+ money transfer operators across the globe as well as to speeds up the transfer process so beneficiaries receive their funds faster” – says Evantagesoft CEO, Arshad Quayyum.

“At RemitONE, we never shy away from innovation and improving the user journey, so it was only right that we partnered with a fintech company that shares our values and vision. We have already prospered from the partnership and we look forward to continuing working with Evantagesoft, to bring established and streamlined remittance services to Pakistan.” – Aamer Abedi, CMO, RemitONE.

For more information about the partnership please contact marketing@remitone.com

About Evantagesoft

Evantagesoft is a FinTech enablement company, providing financial platforms ranging from Digital Banking, Remittance, Mobile Money, Mobile Wallet and various Financial Solutions. Through its proprietary technology, the company is helping in establishing payment railroad with innovative strategies in different economies. Evantagesoft specializes and has diversified technology experience in both product development & custom applications, and implemented quality innovative business solutions for various industry verticals including Financial Services, Telecom, Mass Transit, Entertainment, Real Estate and Sports. For more information, visit: www.evantagesoft.com

About RemitONE

RemitONE is the leading provider of end-to-end money transfer software solutions and related consulting services for banks, money transfer operators (MTOs) and fintech start-ups worldwide. Organisations of all sizes use the award-winning RemitONE platform to run their entire remittance operation with ease and efficiency. Organisations also take advantage of RemitONE Consulting services to grow their business. These services include money service business licence application, bank account setup and access to business connections. For more information, please email marketing@remitone.com

The Future of Remittance – The trends and strategies that will shape 2021

The World Bank predicted that global remittances would decline by 20% as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It remains to be seen if there is any truth to that shocking figure but one thing is for sure – the sector suffered in 2020 and continues to do so in 2021. The question is, are we already on the road to recovery? And if not, how do we get there?

We spoke to three of our clients and partners from three different regions to gather their thoughts and gain some global insight on what lies ahead for the money transfer industry in 2021 – Hugo Cuevas-Mohr, President & CEO of Mohr World Consulting, Walter D’Cruz, CEO of Moneo Solutions and Nadeem Qureshi, CTO at USI Money. Our very own associate sales director Oussama Kseibati quizzed these thought leaders on the key strategies, the technological innovations that might start to emerge and how traditional agent-based MTOs should be reacting to them.

A year of recovery

Oussama began the discussion by reminiscing on how 2020 was a year that necessitated a wider move to digital finance for the entire financial sector: “For remittance, this meant an increase in the use of digital solutions for cross-border payments.” This included a shift to a surprising number of traditionally cash-based agents using digital means to serve clients, with around 60% of domestic and international cash transfers taking place online.

So the stage has already been set. But according to Hugo, if 2020 was a year of forced change then 2021 is going to be a year of resilience and leaning into the challenges posed by anomalies such as COVID-19 and Brexit. From where he stands, the remittance sector has already proved itself to be a resilient force. Indeed for Hugo and Mohr specifically it has been a very challenging time. Their target market is Filipinos sending money home and many Filipinos working in the UK have seen their incomes reduce or disappear completely in the last 12 months as they tend to work in medical and home care sectors.

He explains: “The era of COVID-19 is an uncertain one and that uncertainty is one of the main issues for the global remittance industry, especially when trying to predict recovery. However, despite the issues, the money transfer industry has seen a lot of recovery and migrant communities are continuing to send money to their families, regardless of changes in their own employment situation.”

Nadeem agrees and asserts that: “Despite the decline last year, the money transfer industry is a resilient one and is a sector which will certainly improve a lot faster than many others.” They also both agree that while they feel recovery is indeed already on the cards, we’ll need to wait until we see the data before we draw any solid conclusions.

Strategies for success

Of course, while the sector might be incredibly resilient, it is also far from bulletproof. This means there are going to need to be some solid strategies to help traditional agents-based actors adapt to the digital push of 2020. The primary trend from which all other trends seem to emerge is a mass migration into the digital realm. This will be particularly relevant for small-medium MTOs, as they will have the flexibility to push further into digital solutions as the industry continues its recovery.

For Nadeem, however, he feels it’s the medium-large institutions that will be leading the way. He explains: “Many of these larger MSBs will be down-streaming activities, hoping for increased access to expanding pay-out networks and other digital solutions, such as e-wallets. As the industry recovers and the needs of larger business begin to grow again, the MSBs will also be looking for new ways to grow too, and this will heavily centre on the digital push.”

Oussama then turns the focus onto blockchain and cryptocurrency, stating: “As a direct result of the pandemic some currencies are going to be more volatile and people could seek safe havens in cryptocurrency, which is something many banks are already doing.”

Walter agrees on this increase in blockchain adoption, which is being fuelled by the mainstream capital markets. He adds: “The popularity and interest surrounding blockchain has been growing for several years now but in 2020 we had begun to see it really explode. As well as the obvious focus on cryptocurrency such as bitcoin, blockchain is also being used by enterprise governments and financial institutions to assist with seamlessly managing the exchange of value.” 

Hugo, meanwhile, believes that there will be increased pressure on MTOs for transparency when it comes to fees and FX rates and that blockchain will definitely help with this. And with major names such as JP Morgan already throwing their hats into the ring, blockchain could very well end up being the major player that catalyses recovery as we move deeper into 2021. He also feels that we’ll be seeing more companies working internally to lower costs and more partnerships and integrations by year’s end.

Derisking and the challenger bank solution

According to Hugo, 2020 was the year of the digital tsunami and 2021 is going to be the year of the blockchain and cryptocurrency tsunami and he feels this is going to have a major impact on derisking, which is worse in some countries than in others but is still a global problem. He does also believe, however, that challenger banks might be the solution as long as they are properly integrated with fintech.

He says: “The position of banks as integrators of other services might be making it easier for other banks. This industry has to rely on these partnerships between the new banks and the fintechs and allow them to create solutions together. COVID has certainly pushed that forward, which I guess you could say is something of a silver lining.”

Above all, however, he believes that it’s creativity that is pushing the industry forward and he is inspired by all of the new players doing the groundwork in that regard. Indeed, he feels that’s where the potential for blockchain comes in. 

Oussama asks whether there are “solutions out there with companies acting as an aggregator to open up space as a quicker route to market for smaller MTOs and whether or not the big banks will change their attitude towards MTOs accordingly.” He adds: “With HSBC being fined £1.2 billion as a result of derisking recently, it’s unlikely the larger banks are going to shift their viewpoint but challenger banks are coming through to fill that space.”

According to Walter: “The reason they won’t support MTOs is that you’re not only essentially taking their business away by cutting into a piece of their pie but in their eyes, the risk involved is greater than the value that MTO might bring to the table and that’s all down to the fact there’s a lack of transparency between the bank’s compliance and the MTO.”

For Nadeem, meanwhile, he can see major bank attitudes towards derisking getting worse as the cost and the risk in terms of the fines is just too great compared to the benefits. However, he believes the challenger banks might offer a solution here. He explains: “The challenger banks entering the market are not necessarily going to solve the problem but the smaller MTOs looking for partners are going to have a much better chance at finding partnerships with these challengers than their larger counterparts.”

Then, of course, there is the impact of Brexit to unpack and digest. Generally speaking, our talking heads concluded that there is no need for MTOs to panic as long as they can learn to adapt. There are certainly going to be losses for any MTO based in the UK or Europe that deals with those markets, but London will remain a major financial centre and the centre must hold. For more on their thoughts, you can read our full piece on what Brexit means for the remittance sector – https://www.remitone.com/brexit-is-a-done-deal-but-what-does-that-mean-for-the-remittance-sector/

Will 2021 be the year of innovation or survival?

Walter feels 2021 is going to be more about simply “getting through it” than anything else, but that doesn’t mean he’s without hope. He explains: “I don’t necessarily think this year will initially be about the deployment of new technology. A lot of businesses are still recovering from the fallout of the pandemic so they don’t necessarily have the resources available to do a complete revamp.”

The improvements, he feels will be in an “explosion of partnerships,” because fintechs don’t have the resources to do everything alone, whether that’s compliance, risk or customer service. So they will need the help of both larger partners and the ‘little guys’, such as MTOs. He continues: “More connections and lower costs are going to be the case, broadly speaking for 2021 and it’s concepts like the RemitONE ecosystem that are going to help add value across the whole chain.”

Hugo agrees that 2021 is going to be a year of partnerships and collaboration and a shift in mentality across the board. He argues that MSBs should “forget about doing everything themselves. Everything will be almost modular because, particularly for the smaller companies, somebody else will be able to do one specific thing better and cheaper than you can.” Right now it would appear that we’re living in a world of APIs and developments that are great for small companies which can lower their costs and gain access to these solutions, whether that’s blockchain or something we haven’t even seen yet.

Nadeem, meanwhile, speaks of an e-digital compliance evolution: “When you have a sector with a large amount of competition it’s always going to be about who can provide the best user journey. Digital footprints are starting to grow and Fintechs are challenging regulators and pushing them to improve things, whether that’s through something as advanced as iris scanning technology or as simple as syncing their platform with social media to onboard customers more efficiently.” 

As Oussama sums up: “It’s going to be a year of smaller MTOs challenging the way things are being executed from a more modular approach through blockchain or other methods and we will continue to see this evolution going into 2022 and beyond.”

A beacon of hope

Throughout the talk, our experts also touched on several other more specific topics regarding the regulatory uncertainties in the Nigerian market to the general emerging markets in the African continent and the cost of acquiring new customers. To see the whole discussion for yourself, you can do so right here.

But the session ended on a resolutely positive note. Our experts spoke of advice for start-up money remittance businesses with no prior experience of the business and suggested that it was still a sector ripe with potential as long as these aspirant start-ups were willing to learn, read, research and understand the market. 

They also reiterated what appeared to be the crux of the discussion – that all the different strands of the financial sector need to start working together and forging deeper connections if they hope to succeed and thrive in 2021. That will lead to greater transparency, lower costs and more innovation and RemitONE’s deep ecosystem and malleable compliance network is the perfect middleman to help build and maintain those connections.

For more information or to speak to one of our experts please email marketing@remitone.com

Brexit is a done deal, but what does that mean for the remittance sector?

To say 2020 was a challenging year would be something of an understatement. If the pandemic wasn’t enough, we were then thrown headfirst into a Brexit deal that potentially threatens all UK businesses which trade with the continent. We’re on the other side of a very long, complicated and messy divorce but there are still so many things to unpack and digest, particularly as far as the financial sector is concerned.

Back in 2016, when the referendum result was first announced it was a shell shock to the money transfer and wider financial services industries. But that was almost five years ago now and while London certainly doesn’t look set to be dethroned as a world business capital any time soon, there has certainly been a minor exodus as the UK becomes more of an isolated island.

The immediate ramifications of Brexit

Before the ink could dry on the referendum result, money service businesses across the country began to prepare their backup plans. Of course, those that only served customers in the UK would remain unaffected, as would those operating as SPIs. But those operating under the category of APIs that had a large customer base or agent network in the continent had to apply for new MSB licenses from scratch.

Back in 2017, we posited that it would be the change in banking passporting that would have the most significant impact on money transfer and the wider financial services market. Passporting rights in the years before Brexit helped UK businesses to expand into EU states quickly and at minimal cost and post-Brexit, those privileges would be all but expunged.

Making sense of the Brexit fallout

The immediate fallout of the 31st of December was, as was predicted, that MTOs lost passporting rights. This had a major knock-on effect, with all the MTOs that had accounts within Europe and were safeguarding their funds. A month or so later, we’re now seeing those accounts either being closed or laboured with exorbitantly hiked-up SEPA payment fees.

The UK is also going to find itself fighting for itself as far as regulations are concerned. The European payment regulator that oversees the SEPA payment network will have no interest in fighting for a country that essentially tossed it to one side, after all.

The vast majority of UK-based MTOs will undoubtedly have lost European clients over the last 12 months and most European MTOs will have lost many UK-based clients too. Indeed, all MTOs that rely primarily on inter-European banking will probably lose many more in the ensuing months.

The impact has been compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent global lockdowns. One thing this has done, however, is catalyse a deeper digital penetration in the money transfer sector, with estimates that the digital hold on the sector grew from 20% to 30% from 2019 to 2020. That means remittance software and fintechs are going to play a larger role going forward. But that’s not necessarily a bad thing and it might not be the only silver lining.

Is there a plus side for remittance?

While it might have moved on from the EU from a regulatory perspective, the UK is still an important part of the payments network and London will remain well-positioned for money transfers. Indeed, for MTOs with a higher volume of foreign exchange transfers, London is still arguably the best place to do the business thanks to its abundance of high net-worth individuals and the number of major international businesses that call it their home.

We’ve also seen many companies abandon the UK for greener pastures and some European countries (such as Spain and The Netherlands) have greeted these companies with open arms. Other companies, particularly smaller ones, have turned to mergers or partnerships with larger competitors to be able to access their European clients.

Thankfully, as the UK was wise enough to adopt the PSD2 open banking regulations back in 2018, the businesses that could afford to expand into other EU states could do so without being tangled up in miles of expensive bureaucratic red tape. But it’s still an expense that many smaller MTOs could have done without.

Then there are those who have proselytised the idea of pivoting away from Europe entirely. Michael Kent, the Cofounder of Azimo, for example, believes we should be looking towards Africa, where remittance is proving to be a crucial lifeline in the absence of governmental pandemic support.

According to RemitONE CEO Anwar H Saleem, however, there is no need for MTOs to panic as long as they can learn to adapt and lean into the changes. He explains: “London has always been a major financial hub for Europe and this is not going to change any time soon now that we’re no longer a member of the EU. It will, however, push those businesses that remain in London to innovate and lead the way. RemitONE are already committed to charting this new course with confidence.”

Can UK money transfer businesses survive Brexit?

While it didn’t end up being the highly prophesied ‘no-deal Brexit’ for most, for the financial services and remittance sector, it might as well have been. With no agreement on the regulatory equivalence between the EU and the UK, there is still a lot of work to be done.

For those operating in both the UK and the EU, there are certainly some tough choices to be made.  But ultimately, it’s going to be up to the UK and the MTOs that have chosen to stay behind to ensure it remains relevant and doesn’t lose its standing on the global remittance stage. Whatever the next few years have in store for us, the best thing any MTO can do is arm themselves with the facts and prepare for every and any eventuality.

If you’re uncertain about the future and are looking for support regarding licensing issues post-Brexit, RemitONE is ready to take your call. Using our industry-leading bespoke and secure money transfer software, we can help any established firm or new entity looking to establish in the UK or Europe to navigate the increasingly complicated logistical and regulatory waters spun up by Brexit.

For more information or to speak to one of our experts please email marketing@remitone.com

Video: Remittances in Africa

Remittances: Getting digital-ready for post-pandemic recovery

The world bank has predicted that remittances are set to decline by 20% as a direct result of the pandemic, marking the sharpest decline in recent history. This is understandable on a surface level, of course, as remittance payments are most commonly sent between families and friends, and in the current climate, for migrant workers particularly, the pandemic has caused a dramatic fall in wages and employment.

However, the remittance sector is nothing if not resilient and for some, the pandemic has proven to be something of a catalyst for a sea of change that’s been simmering just under the surface for years now. Could COVID-19 be the final push the sector needs to jump off the digital cliff edge once and for all? With ‘Neobanks’ like Monzo, Starling and Revolut paving the way, the waters are not quite as untested as you might think.

Of course, our industry has various supply chain members, all of which will have a different opinion and angle on the story. As a leading technology vendor, we reached out to an aggregator (Sidharth Gautam from AZA Finance), a payment processor (David Lambert from Transact 365), an ID verification provider (Richard Spink from GBG) and a Money Transfer Operator, (Nadeem Quershi from USI Money), to ask them how they were preparing for a digital post-pandemic recovery and where they see the biggest innovations happening moving forward.

How do you see the future of the payments industry evolving?

Nadeem

The COVID crisis has had a profound impact on the escalation of digitisation in the payment industry. Our previous primary method of processing payments was rather manual, but in the wake of social distancing, we’ve been forced into ensuring our processes are more digitised. I think that’s going to have a major short and long term impact with digitisation continuing to escalate at a rapid pace.

Richard

It’s always going to be down to what the individual MTO wants to achieve when they run a compliance process. There’s a difference between just running a process and being compliant and our experience is that some businesses will want to take that seriously and others will want to just pay lip service to it. There are two reasons for that – one is that there’s a cost to being compliant and the other is that there’s a proliferation of vendors out there now. When I started in the UK 10 years ago there were perhaps 10 vendors. Now there are around 50 money transfer operators in the UK alone and hundreds globally.

How do you see the digital channel fees changing for MTOs as the channels shift from agents to a heavier reliance on digital channels?

David

The fees themselves always come down as volume goes up. When you’re talking about lower risk payment processing the margins are always going to be razor-thin. Already today I’m seeing fees online that are almost rock bottom and it’s only going to get slower. Then there’s the prospect of open banking which is going to blow everything open and remove the baseline costs even further. Ultimately it’s a competitive and a healthy environment and the fees are going to be falling but we are in this to help each other and make money. So while the fees might be coming down, we should always keep our shared end goals in mind.

Sidharth

70% of the remittance market today is cash-based but the tide is shifting and as it does the fees are going to go down. We’re already seeing it move southwards and as the 30% increases and the 70% reduces it’s going to exacerbate that reduction exponentially.

Richard

Prices will go down, of course. But they’re not going to suddenly plummet. There is a point at which we won’t go below (that rock-bottom David referred to) then there’s the cost of going digital that smaller MTOs have to consider. The price point will come down over time but then the technology you choose to invoke will change over time too.

The other thing that’s happening at the same time is that businesses are talking about digital ID. So the technologies to digitise identities is already there but the confidence to accept it probably isn’t just yet. In the next 12 months if you’re looking at how to make your process complaint online you have plenty of choices and the decision needs to be whether you’re looking for a quick fix or a process that’s scalable in the long term?

How does risk play into digitising money transfer?

Nadeem

The real question is do MTOs assume more risk online than in the traditional model? I believe that they don’t. We’re living in an age where digital risks have been largely mitigated by the complexity of new digital IDs. So I honestly don’t see it as any riskier than the traditional model of somebody visiting a brick and mortar location and presenting a physical ID. We have automated lists with regards to sanctions and screening so can build watertight systems to manage risks that are arguably just as proficient as the traditional model.

David

I partially agree with Nadeem. However, I’d argue that the moment you remove the cardholder from the equation in a physical capacity, the risk naturally increases. We can never be 100% sure on the surface if the cardholder who is making the transaction is the actual cardholder. Not if we can’t physically see them.

Where Nadeem is correct is in the responsibility of technology in ensuring those risks are reduced. If the tech is implemented correctly and the right controls are in place then there is going to be less risk. But fraudsters are very smart and they’re always getting smarter. I’ve worked in money transfer for a decade now and have seen so many different ways that fraudsters can behave – loopholes and tricks that technology can struggle to keep up with. The risks are manageable if you do it correctly but if you get it wrong then the risks can be ten times higher.

Sidharth

My response would be somewhere in between Nadeem and David’s. Our business is focused primarily on Africa and in that region, we’re seeing a lot of digital MTOs joining our platform, more and more every day. AI will definitely play a part in mitigating the risk but the risk is always going to be there. The question is how fast the technology can improve.

Richard

As soon as you’re online you’re introducing more risks, but the technology is there to mitigate the risk. As a rule of thumb, If it looks dodgy then it probably is. As long as you run a verifiable process online to mitigate those risks then it’s worth any cost. All online businesses must accept that fraud is part and parcel of the deal. As long as you accept that, go into it with your eyes open and put the right amount of resources behind it then it’s always going to be worth the risk.

Does the digital model present more opportunity for MTOs or are we operating in a saturated market?

Nadeem

The amount of MTOs that have gone digital in the last 9 months is probably more than in the last 9 years and COVID has played a major role in that. A lot of these conversions are not new entrants into the market but are existing MTOs that has been operating more traditionally and have been forced into the digital model.

David

There’s always an opportunity to be found in chaos. Throughout history, hundreds of companies have been forged in times of crisis. Disney was formed out of the 1929 depression, Microsoft came out of a major recession in the 70s and in 2008 it’s the banking crisis that kicked off Bitcoin and Fintech. The way that compliance has moved forward so fast in recent months has really spawned a rise in applications for electronic money licenses.

The implications of that are massive and have led to an environment where everybody wants to be a digital bank. It’s like when the Beatles came along and everybody wanted to be in a rock band. Now, thanks to the Monzos and Revoluts of the world, everybody wants to be involved in Fintech. This is perhaps why, now that we’re all in crisis mode, that so many MTOs are looking to upgrade their money licenses so they can perform different functions and expand into something more.

Sidharth

Asia and Africa are frontier emerging economies. Whilst the vaccine will be a reality in the western world it’s going to take a lot longer to filter into the emerging markets. Given that they are the primary markets for our industry it’s even more apparent that digital is the way to go. Because whilst the western world might be able to return to some semblance of normality sooner rather than later, the emerging markets that rely on remittance are still going to need to rely solely on digital.

Richard

In theory, as long as a financial service business has a steady platform, they can drive the business in any way they want. I think the difference is whether your focus is on driving transactions or taking the bolder step of becoming a fully regulated business. Revolut is a good example of a business that has spent all of its time and effort acquiring customers and are now embarking on the hard bit of actually becoming a proper bank.

I think that everyone would like to see an organisation do that successfully – pivot from a business that has a large number of customers into one that actually makes money from lending money. There’s an opportunity there to scale a business from an MTO into something that provides other financial services too.

Are we seeing MTOs evolve into these Neobanks or are we saying that the pie is quite big and each will have its own role within that pie?

Nadeem

We are seeing the more established MTOs move from conventional standard payments into things like e-money wallets and they are using this type of functionality as part of their wider growth plans. But generally, I think we will be seeing some form of consolidation amongst the larger MTOs. In the larger sense, the more established players have access to more resources so they will be the ones that will be moving forward.

David

Sometimes I feel like an outsider and sometimes it’s good to have that perspective where I’m not immersed deeply inside the money transfer sector. But I advise, consult and work with several different money transfer companies. One of the things that’s interesting that I see from my perspective is that everybody has their strengths and their positions within the market. If you look at companies like Small World, for example, they work with so many smaller MTOs to provide payouts and if you look at Azimo they rely on a number of different partners to help them get into certain parts of the world.

No one can do everything by themselves as one complete unit. So consolidation and licensing are interesting for me because every single MTO out there is trying to do something relatively unique. One company might be stronger in one area than another and by working together they can offer something more holistic and of greater quality overall. So I think consolidation should 100% be on the roadmap for everyone. My only fear about consolidation is that it actually shrinks the competitive element of any industry but I think that’s a little further down the line.

Sidharth

It’s already happening. Around two and a half months back WorldRemit acquired Sendwave for $500 million. This was a growth acquisition and it’s one of many floating around right now. There is also word on the grapevine that Western Union may buy Moneygram, which is one of the top three MTOs in the world.

David

Sidharth said something interesting about acquisition for growth rather than acquisition for revenue and I have seen that a lot in the payments industry. There is a huge amount of consolidation of payment service providers buying other payment service providers simply to grow because growth is so essential for a lot of MTOs, especially when we’re operating on such thin margins.

With all this technology at our disposal, why are we still having an issue with de-risking?

Richard

Since I started talking to MTOs in 2012, I’ll be honest, it’s not got any easier. The first question I ask people as a qualifying question is ‘have you got a bank account’. If they haven’t got a bank account then they’re wasting my time because I know they won’t be using our software until they get that bank account.

The big banks just won’t take the risk. It’s too much hassle and that’s a business banking problem anyway. They could easily take the risk if they choose to, it’s whether they have the resources to be able to deliver that and that’s where you’ve got the disruption coming. Can smaller banks take on that risk? Because in another sense they have less risk in it potentially going wrong.

Nadeem

De-risking has been going on for a number of years but at the end of the day, from a bank’s perspective, it comes down to purely to risk versus reward. For this reason, I don’t think you’re going to see a change in banks attitudes or habits when it comes to de-risking. David also correctly mentioned the rise of the Neobanks and some of these smaller challenger banks but they come with their own set of limitations.

What about regulators? Should the onus be on them to make sure that this continues to be a vibrant and healthy 600 billion dollar industry?

Nadeem

Regulators are there to create a framework, structure, processes and regulations. When it comes to safeguarding good practices, regulators are increasing some of these rules and regulations but can they force banks to actually support clients? I don’t think that’s their objective or their remit.

David

I don’t think it’s in the regulators best interests to push the banks, I think when a company becomes FCA regulated it has to be independent of the banks in some respect. Because, if the FCA and banks were in cahoots with each other it would be it much easier to operate but you’d also leave yourself much more open to fraud. If the two remain independent and they are independently scrutinised you have a sort of double lock system.

Sidharth

Regulators are becoming more and more progressive enablers to our industry. At least in my experience. In the UK and Europe, we have the example of open banking which is fuelling innovation and is also making the industry more compliant. All the stakeholders are becoming more and more transparent and it is helping to increase the credibility of the segments.

Africa and Asia are still very very fragmented. 54 countries with 54 different regulations. So they have a lot of catching up to do but then you can clearly see in Kenya, Uganda and Nigeria that things are moving at a very fast pace and regulators are moving likewise.

Finally, where do you think the biggest innovations will be moving forward?

David

A lot of innovation is happening right at our doorstep in the Fintech space. Payments is an ever-evolving industry. Every single day there’s a new payment method, a new way of doing things or a new market that can be exploited. Once blockchain technology has crossed over into the mainstream and people realise they can effectively move money as fast as they can send an email, that’s going to be the big breakthrough, that’s the innovation.

Nadeem

There is excitement around blockchain, digitisation of tokens and the ability to make payments instantaneously, of course. But there’s also innovation around digitised prints in terms of digital KYC and simplifying processes for consumers. I think simplification is going to be a key in terms of ensuring not only that funds are instantaneous but that the customer relationship does not simply finish at the point of collection or deposit.

Our thanks to David, Richard, Nadeem and Sidharth for their words and their time.

For more information or to speak to one of our experts please email marketing@remitone.com

AI: Empowering Fintech and Money Transfer Firms

From its humble start in the 1950s to the extensive uses now frequently seen across all industries, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has very clearly grown into one of the most innovative and game-changing technologies. It’s becoming increasingly evident that the role of AI, especially within financial services and the digital realm of remittances, has become crucial for providing improved services. Even over the last decade, AI has continued to evolve, reducing and even eliminating manual processes for the financial services sectors.

Machine Learning and Security

Enabled by predictive power, pattern recognition and enhanced communication functionality, AI is proving it has the potential to boost financial services and transform the way these services are delivered to customers. AI could empower Fintech firms to have more informed and bespoke products and services, internal process efficiencies, enhanced cyber-security and reduced risk.

For example, in the payments industry, AI is currently being used for sanctions screening and fraud prevention – a process underpinning money transfer organisations. Until recently, many organisations screened for sanctions by checking data stored in mass databases. Although this technique is routinely used by most financial services firms, in recent years we’ve seen that AI can be applied to this activity as well as other fraud prevention processes. Learning through experience, the AI technology can begin to better understand the backend data in order to search more quickly and efficiently, ultimately resulting in fewer false positive results. 

The Future of AI: Improved End-User Experience

In the next few years, we predict that the financial services industry will certainly begin to see an increased use of AI surrounding security and compliance, as well as other backend processes. However, it is also becoming more evident that money transfer operators (MTOs) could soon be incorporating AI on their frontend applications (mobile apps and online portals) to enhance customer experience.  

For example, we’ve already begun to see instances of machine-learning powered ‘chatbots’ offering 24/7 support and guidance to MTO customers. Using natural language processing, these chatbots – amongst other AI-driven voice-based services – will be able to understand queries and provide solutions, enhancing the overall end-user experience. 

In addition to this, a less obvious area for AI use we could be seeing in the near future is for managing the rates and fees charged to remittance customers or end-users. By applying machine learning, MTOs could begin to make predictions based on a variety of factors (including existing data, patterns and even seasonal changes) in order to help customers set their rates and charges more effectively. 

Where Will AI Go Now?

It’s clear to see that AI and machine learning are beginning to drive a wide range of processes, both within the digital remittance realm and beyond. The outcome of this increase in automation is the opportunity for many companies to work more precisely and efficiently than ever before.  

As a result, we can confidently predict that the financial services industry will be seeing a lot more of AI driven technologies. But what would you like to see from the remittance industry going forward?  

If you’d like more information about the power of AI within Fintech or would like to engage in a discussion about the future of machine learning, please get in touch at marketing@remitone.com